Andrew Exum offers a roundup of opinion and his own take on the Michael Hastings/General McChrystal issue in "Beers on the Table: Journalists and the Public Figures they Cover." Be sure to read the comments thread.
My own two cents: Twenty years or more ago I spent time as a journalist covering the military. Ground rules are important, but no one is suggesting Hastings violated any explicit ground rules. Did the McChrystal folks think that sitting around having a few after hours rendered the conversation off the record? You'd be surprised how easy it is to preface even a somewhat well-lubricated conversation with "Don't use this, but . . ." or "You didn't hear this from me." Rolling Stone is not Army Times; you may not assume any ground rules you don't spell out beforehand. If anybody feels betrayed by all this, it's worrisome for what it says about their security sense.
Friday, June 25, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment